USA Member News & Info

Executive Ballots, Organization News, USA Office Announcements, USA General Board Meeting Information,

USA Organization News

New USA Scorebooks

January 2, 2009

The United Schutzhund Clubs of America is transitioning to AWDF-approved scorebooks (which have the AWDF logo and the appropriate breed club logo). The scorebooks are now being issued by the USA Office and have the AWDF and USA logos on them. The price for the new scorebooks will remain at $10.

The new AWDF-approved scorebook will be required for entry in the AWDF Championship beginning in 2009. This requirement applies exclusively to the AWDF Championship. Those entering the 2009 AWDF Championship will not be charged the $10 fee for the new scorebook when their application for the new scorebook is accompanied by a paid entry into the AWDF Championship.

Those wishing to represent USA with their German Shepherd Dog at the 2009 AWDF Championship must be sure that their event entry form and scorebook application are received at the USA Office no later than April 25, 2009.

Photo by Mary Dygert

Karen Sinclair with Ule and their trophies. The wooden one to the left is the regional recognition award for the high scoring dog from the Pacific NW Region. The gold and silver cup is for the USA Siegerin award.

2008 Universal Siegerin

November 16, 2008

Congratulations to the 2008 Universal Siegerin, V1 Ule v. TeMar SchH3, FH, KKL1-lbz. She is owned and trained by Karen Sinclair. Ule is USA bred and co-Owned by Mary Dygert. Ule and Karen tied for High in Tracking at the 2008 GSD National Championship with 100 points!

Watch for more details in the spring 2009 USA magazine!

WUSV Meeting

October 2, 2008

Photo by Lyle Roetemeyer

(From Left), Al Govednik, Yves De Clercq and Lyle Roetemeyer

While in Europe for the WUSV Meeting, USA President, Lyle Roetemeyer had the opportunity to travel to Belgium for a meeting with the Secretary General of the FCI, Yves De Clercq. Also attending the meeting were AWDF President and USA Director at Large, Al Govednik and USA National Breed Warden, Tim Burke.

2008 WUSV Judge's Meeting

September 24, 2008

USA Director of Judges, Mark Przybylski, attended the 2008 WUSV Judge's Meeting in Darmstadt, Germany. There were 59 Judges there from 30 different countries. The emphasis on the meeting was strongly geared to rules applications, evaluation of exercises, and point assessment based on quality of work, training, and behaviors. This meeting emphasized proper judging in accordance with the current rules.

The following is a summary of issues discussed at the meeting.

DEVELOPMENT OF A DOG

In order to clearly evaluate a dog, a brief synopsis was given regarding development of the dog which would help understand the learning and training processes. This was broken down into three categories; Pre-natal, neo-natal, and juvenile.

Pre-Natal was described as the first 2 weeks after birth. It is here were the puppy is introduced to stress and stimulus.

Neo-Natal was described as the period from 4-14 weeks. During this time the dog learns fear and aggression and the handler should try to have these two elements work in harmony. The dog must learn to win and learn to lose. It is during this time the dog(s) should be introduced to all types of stimuli and environment.

Juvenile Phase was described starting at around 5-8 months of age. It is here were the dog learns body language, interacts with people, and learns the body language of people and helpers, and establishing a harmonious working relationship with its owner. The dog should be exposed to all environments and learn to self explore these environments. It is during these phases in particular that dogs learning what are harmful, and what is not. What is to fear, and what is not to fear. Teaching should be in an active manner to overcome these fears.

WHAT MAKES THE “V” PERFORMANCE

One of the problems that has developed over the past few years, is the rating of “excellent” is given far too often. This seems to be more common as it relates to dogs of less character and genetics. In statistics gathered through Europe, dogs are given an “excellent” rating about 40% of the time. As compared to 10 plus years ago the number was 4% to 10%. Part of this is judges are not following the guidelines, not understanding the rules, and not having a clear understanding of character, temperament and genetics. All dogs, no matter what the breed, no matter of breed versus show, must be evaluated the same.

The dog’s temperament must be tested throughout. It starts at the beginning. It is strongly recommended that we use many of the adjective descriptors available to us to note what the animal demonstrates from the onset. This will help place the dog in the appropriate category and rating. In order for the dog to receive an “excellent” rating he must demonstrate the following;

Must be happy
Must be free
Must be correct in all parts of an exercise
Must be well trained
Must show harmony between dog and handler
Must show drive (temperament and character)
Must show balance in drives

IMPLEMNTATION OF TRIAL RULES

We basically have three different sets of trial rules; VDH, WUSV, and the FCI (IPO) rules. The VDH outlines the performance for all the titles; starting with the BH and through Schutzhund Three and other titles as currently outlined. The WUSV rules were discussed as the ultimate application of rules, as to ensure that no matter what country the judge is from, that the handler will show with the same expectation of assessment for their handling and showing.

For example: Here in the USA we can judge 36 portions. A judge from Germany may only be able to judge 30 portions. The judge cannot alter his/her rules from his/her country to apply them here. That judge must follow the rules from that country as dictated by his VDH rules.

DISQUALIFICATION

Again the topic of disqualification was covered. It was reported that in Germany that the number of “disqualifications” has increased. If a person is disqualified, then in most cases, all points and rating are lost as well. Disqualification and can occur for the following reasons;

Poor sportsmanship
Breaking of the rules
Temperament
Animal cruelty
Common decency
Possession of motivation object during a trial
Lack of control
Fails to out after 2 commands
Fails to control after 3 command

TRACKING

Not much new here. I will bullet the highlights and then give some clarifications on rules enforcement/interpretation.

Land should be as uniform as possible, but not required
Judge orders the track order and pattern
Each pattern should be different
Must have a start flag
Must have a draw for tracking
Flag must be directly to the left of the scent pad (not 1m)
Tracks must laid in normal, as well as the corners
Level 2 & 3 dogs, dogs and handler must be out of sight
If the dog reaches the last leg within time frame, must allow dog to finish the track
No time requirement or limit for start
No minimum size for article dictated
No help from tracklayer if terrain changes

Specific questions were asked regarding the following situations.

Reporting In

“..handler must report ready for tracking”. The tracking leash must be laid out so that the judge can see the length. The line may be attached to the collar. It does not have to under the leg or attached to the harness when reporting in.

Article Indication

The handler must indicate that the article will either be pointed out or picked up. If the handler reports that the dog will pick up he can do the following option; pick up and sit at the article location, pickup and stand at the article location or pickup and retrieve to the handler. The dog cannot lie down and pick up the article. The speed of the indication may by in-line with the speed of the dogs track. For example; if the dog track slow, the article indication does not have to be extremely fast. As longs as the indication is sure and with purpose a slow indication may not be faulty when considering the dog’s temperament and character.

Praise

At the article praise can be before or after but not both. The handler cannot praise the dog as the handler picks up the article. If praise comes prior to showing the article, there must be a clear pause between the two. Praise the dog, stand up/break from the dog, then retrieve the article. Once the handler has followed the dog after the start(s) and after the corner and the handler is clearly in the leg, the slight verbal praise is allowed.

Working of the Track

The dog from the time he reports in should show no pressure. The start is part of the evaluation for the first leg. During the track the dog must demonstrate self reliance, harmonious relationship with handler and environment, consistent in the work, intensive, active in searching, temperament and character of the dog are relevant in the rating. If a dog is tracking, and makes a check off to the side without leaving the track, this may not be faulty. This is the same with the corners. A dog that takes a corner cleanly may be evaluated the same as the dog that stop to determine the track direction, then proceeds. But the action of the second dog must be quick and convincing. A dog that changes its pace because of difficulty or terrain change should not be faulted. Environment and ground conditions can be taken into consideration as part of the overall evaluation.

FH1 and FH2

The FH1 must have a street and changes of terrain. Going from one dirt field to another is not a change of terrain. However, in grass field, there may changes of terrain in that field and could be considered sufficient. But there has to be a clear change in terrain. For the FH2, a road may not be required, but there must be another type of difficulty (fence, ditch, tree line etc).

Evaluating the Track

In evaluating the team, there are several factors to be considered. These should be kept in mind during the entire tracking, corners, and article indication. Also the judge must in position at all times to see the dog’s work and article indication. If the tracks are laid in high vegetation (1m), the judge must be close enough to see the dog and approach close enough to verify the indication of the article.

Tempo must be constant
Tempo can change with terrain changes
Tempo can change with change in difficulty
Nature of the soil and terrain
Humidity, temperature, and wind
Height of vegetation
Contamination
Superficial behaviors
Dog must make 100% of the decisions
The dog is in the tracking phase from the moment they walk onto the field, and after they leave the field. Any rewards given prior to the completion of any critique, is grounds for “disqualification”
The dog can sit or stand when placing the line underneath, but not down and no obedience commands may be given when preparing the dog with the line
Dogs temperament and character or part of the evaluation
Line can be held in either hand or in both hands during the track
At the start, the dog may be brought in from any direction. However, if the dog is brought in from where the tracklayer walked, and the dog’s tracks through the start, it may be faulty. But remember, part of the evaluation is that no time limit is required for the start.

OBEDIENCE

There were not many questions regarding obedience. It was again stressed that the dog’s temperament and drives should be clearly explained to the handler and spectators. Here are a few bulleted items;

Judge tells when to begin each exercise
Handler is responsible for the content of each exercise
Commands can be given in any language, but must be consistent
3 commands are allowed to perform an exercise, then it results in severe points loss to disqualification
If a dog does not finish an exercise, the highest rating is insufficient
If a dog does not come into basic position after three commands, 6 points off
In the send out, it is broken down into 2 five point parts; basic positions, build up, send out, and distance. The second part is the down and pickup. If 2 commands given, the rating is good, if three commands are given it is high insufficient
The basic position can only be taken one time. If the handler adjust more than one time, points are taken
The handler must display three seconds between parts of the exercises, and does not have to wait for the judges signal to finish.

During the heeling exercises the following items were noted;

Dog must be free from pressure
Must be straight and at handlers knee
Errors in the Basic Position is part of the overall evaluation for that exercise
Watch the 3 second rule
Pickups can be from either side
Giving a command to heel, then waiting 3 seconds or notable pause to start is faulty. The handler and dog must move at, or directly after the command to heel is given
Must be a clear distinction in evaluations and describe the dogs; concentration, activity to work, freeness, temperament, association with the handler, and recognize the difference between correct and not correct, and temperament and lack of temperament
No motivation between exercises
No motivation with the dumbbell
Handler must go directly to the position for the retrieves

For the retrieves we must check the equipment for proper height and safety. At a trial, only the dumbbells provided by the hosting club can be used. Spitting on or rubbing on the dumbbell is faulty. No reposition is allowed. One interesting point was on the 1 meter jump and the dog should knock the jump over. In this case, the jump is repositioned and the handler is allowed to throw the dumbbell again; however, the only portion that is evaluated is the return jump. All other portions; initial jump, pickup, sit in front, hold, and finish have already been evaluated. If on the second jump the jump is knocked over again, then the jump is rated as no return. Other general rules are as follows;

Handlers must walk in a normal manner and normal pace
Walking too slow is faulty during the normal pace
Dog must clearly demonstrate a change of paces
About turns must be on the same line
Slowing or increasing speeds is not part of the counted steps
Depending on the layout, it may be permissible for the club to demonstrate two left turns as opposed to 2 right turns
Dog must be clear headed
Not natural for the dog to look 100 percent at the handler’s eyes, this is based on the physical makeup and flexibility of the dog. But the dog must be attentive and show relationship to the handler
The jumps should be direct and powerful
If the handler moves after the dog is sent, the highest rating is high insufficient

For the sit exercise, the dog must sit with concentration and purpose. Looking around may not be faulty if the dog with strong temperament is being aware of the environment. The same applies to the down/recall and the stand in motion.

PROTECTION

This area is generally discussed by spectators more that the other parts of the exercises. It is critically important that we are clear in our critiques to ensure that the reason for the rating is that the dog displayed/possessed certain traits or characteristics. We must describe the drives, balance of drives, power and temperament. We must also describe in each exercise how the dog attempts to stop the helper, and reacts to the pressure and the stick hits. We must make it clear for example; comparing a dog with good speed, adequate power and faultless mechanics can not be rated as high as compared to a dog with power, balance in drives, and this dog may make slight fault in portions of the exercise. The dogs with superior traits and training must be recognized. A dog lacking character and intensity in the work cannot receive a “v” rating. A dog that is consistent in behavior but is lacking throughout can only received a “good” rating.

Basic rules for disqualification were covered;

Lack of temperament
Lack of control
Biting the helper other than the sleeve
No out

In describing the part regarding biting the helper, a dog that nips is not to have considered biting the helper. This is referring to the dog that fully engages and grips the helper on other parts outside the sleeve. No changes from out current evaluation on how the grip is evaluated under our current program.

Blind Search

The commands given by the handler should be made while walking in motion down the field. The dog should run in front of the handler. However, if a dog of strong character runs behind the handler one time only, this should not be faulted. However, if a dog runs behind a second time, the highest rating should be a “g”. It is not important that we see the eyes of the dog looking into the blind, but more importantly recognize the behavior and the posture of the dog at the blind. These signs would be able to demonstrate to the judge that the blind was searched convincingly. No criteria were set on how wide the dog is allowed to run the blind. In videos that we watched, it was more typical of a dog with lesser character to run fast and lacking purpose to run the blinds wide. The rules describe a close and tight search, but there may be some allowance for a very fast dog (only if his character is strong).

HOLD AND BARK

This was an interesting discussion on some points. The first point was that the guard must 100% towards the helper, then followed by a statement that “…a dog of strong character, showing aggression, self assuredness, and balance in drives, may not be faulted if the dog detects a movement and quickly checks and then returns to the helper”. The position was stated that we do not want a robotic dog. It would be negligent to take away the dog’s natural being during an exercise. Here are some other points;

Dog must be active and attentive
Must be powerful and demonstrate balance in drives
Must be self assured
The hold and bark duration is 20 seconds
In IPO, there is a call back in IPO1 (no pick up)
Helper must observe the dog and movements
Helper does not have to make direct eye contact
Weak barking is minimum of high good
Strong guard and no bark, minus 5 points
If a dog leaves the blind or is going to be sent a second time, the handler cannot call the dog back into the basic position and resend. If the handler does this, this is cause for disqualification
If a dog comes back prematurely on the call back, the highest rating is only high in the high insufficient

During disarming exercises, the helper can step back one step if requested. However, at higher events, judge can set the standard so that all dogs are shown the same.

The next point of discussion was three exercises because the dog receives different penalties for the same behavior. If the dog is disobedient in the blind during the hold and bark, and bites, up to 9 points is taken. The handler cannot say "out".

During the back transport, if the dog breaks and engages the helper before the handler can gain control, this is mandatory disqualification for “out of control”.

OVERALL PROTECTION EVALUATION

It was stressed that during the evaluation that the judge must clearly describe the behaviors, temperaments, drives, and hardness of the dog. It is the hope then when faced with dogs of different character/temperament, that when explaining to the public why a dog showing a fault can be rated higher over a dog of less power and temperament with better technical skills.

In all phases, the dog must be watchful towards the helper.

RULE CHANGERS

There are no current rule changes. There will be some rule changes in 2010. Here are some items currently being discussed. These are only items being discussed and nothing is yet been determined.

In tracking the point assessment will change for articles so that if a dog misses all the article the dog cannot pass
In obedience the climbing wall may eliminated for Sch 1
On the climbing wall, the dog must touch certain area of the wall to get full points, jumping high and off the wall would be faulty
Heeling on leash may be back in Sch 1. This would incorporate the BH and Sch 1 in one and same showing
Required mandatory commands in certain phases
Required command in transports would be “transport”
Point allocation and dismissal would be closer or the same if the dog makes the same mistake in different parts of the protection
Big pressure to eliminate the long bite and the sticks hits. Currently the vast majority do not want to eliminate either
If the long grip is eliminated, it would follow the DPO call off, then a hold and bark, and re-attack
Talks regarding attack out of the blind in lieu of escape and defense
Under WUSV rules, the current would not change

GEC 2008 Awards

September 24, 2008

We give below details of the GEC Awards which all clubs can win by completing a simple form (attached) and submitting to their Regional Director with a copy to me. Please attempt to complete this by month end (September) or ask for more time if needed.

Award Forms

Award Work Sheet (Word document)
This is the preferred one for completing the application.
Award Work Sheet (PDF Document)
Award Criteria

Full details of the award are given below and are also available in the GEC Blog ( www.usa-blog.org) and in the USA website (www.germanshepherddog.com). It is also attached for your convenience.

The rationale for the Awards are given below but simply are to recognize Clubs which are "best of breed" ( to use a familiar term) and to reward them. There are cash awards (up to $400) as well as other prizes (trophies, plaques, pins etc) which are all currently being funded with the GEC budget alone. Obviously there are also non-tangible rewards as well.

Please contact me or any member of the GEC for any details. We wish you every success in winning the Regional and possibly the National Award for 2007 and which we hope to be able to present to the winning clubs at the meeting held in November this year.

We are also extending some of the deadlines as we find that some clubs are not aware of the GEC award and the simple process involved to participate. Please feel free to cross post and forward to your club members and teams.

If you have any questions please let me know (and provide a telephone number so that I can call you).

Regards;
Rifky Mackeen
Chair - USA General Education Committee

USA Team for the 2008 WUSV

July 24, 2008

It is our pleasure to announce the United Schutzhund Clubs of America WUSV Team for 2008: James Honda, Debra Zappia and Eric Eisenberg will be our representatives. The WCC has unanimously decided that Terry Macias will be the USA Team Captain for the 2008 WUSV World Championship . Being that the U.S. is the host country, the WCC has decided to have an additional 2 assistant team captains in Thomas Vollrath and Howie Rodriguez.

Looking forward to your attendance and support!

Howie Rodriguez
Chair, USA World Championship Committeee

WUSV Banquet Tickets

July 24, 2008

This is to remind you that we have only 0 days left until the WUSV 2008 Championship.

If you would like to join us for the WUSV 2008 Championship Banquet held on Saturday, October 11^th, and have not ordered your ticket yet, please check in on our web-site at WUSV Banquet Tickets, www.wusv2008.org/banquet_tickets.htm purchase your tickets.

Ordering your ticket now will be extremely helpful and will make my job much easier.

Remember: Ordering your tickets online is the only way you can pay by credit card and you will get the reduced price of $35.00 (saving $5 per ticket) and you can be assured for the best reserved table seating. Tickets for $40.00 can be purchased at the event but must be purchased in CASH.

Thank you very much!

Loni Grewe
Auxiliary Event Coordinator

Regional Directors' and President's Awards

July 24, 2008

Click here to view the award criteria.

The General Education Committee of the USA is pleased to advise the creation of eleven awards to be granted annually to showcase member clubs of the USA. There will be ten Regional awards and one National Presidents award.

These awards are intended to spotlight and reward Clubs which are conforming to all rules of good behavior and conduct with respect to its membership, its canines and the general public.

In addition these awards are designed to encourage every club to a higher standard of excellence in promoting their canines and club activities to both the membership and more importantly, to the general public thereby helping to dilute any anti-dog sentiment or breed specific resentment

It is envisaged that all nominations will be submitted by end of August 2008 and that the selection by the Regional Selection Committee will be completed by end September 2008. The winning clubs will be determined by October 15, 2008 so that awards can be made in November 2008 based on compliance with the criteria in 2007.

We would like to thank all members of the GEC and in particular Marnie Rose and Melinda Dalby who contributed to this effort. We are also grateful to other USA members who vetted the drafts and provided positive and constructive input.

USA Rulebook Changes

June 6, 2008

USA Director of Judges Mark Przybylski has released the updates for the rules at trials.

Click here for a PDF version

Many different interpretations of the rule changes had been implemented and distributed by the SV and we did try and make sure that we had the most complete before we attempted to put them in force. We also wanted to wait until the FCI Judges meeting to make sure that we were also in agreement with them due to the increased usage of FCI judges at USA trials.

Actual handing down of rules occurs as follows: FCI to the AZG which then goes to the VDH which of course relays to the SV, each country may still decide to adopt or not adopt a specific rule or create a variance as to its’ interpretation which is usually where the confusion starts to set in.

The actual first draft of them was delayed because of unforeseen factors, but the rules were still being meted out as the USA judges attempted to make them known, I hope that you will bear with me for the time frame being as extensive as it was.

TRACKING

There were a few changes that became evident here. Head checks on the track with a dog that tracks consistently are not subject to the penalties that may have been marked in the past, also, the vegetation, wind and the temperature are also taken into consideration when scoring and evaluating the track.

When the track is laid, there is to be more of a natural pace while actually laying the track. Heavy stepping while laying the track is not allowed and the laying of the scent pad must not be heavy, although there may be some extra time (slight stepping) here.

Also, the articles on the SchH1 track will be as the articles on the SchH2 track - first article on the second leg and last article at the end of the track. It is no longer the choice of the handler as to article placement in SchH1.

Praising at the articles may be before or after you show the article to the judge, which means, when you go to your dog upon an article indication, you may praise (such as petting or verbal praise) before you pick up the article to show it to the judge or you may do it after you show the article to the judge. You may not praise while you are picking up the article and/or showing it to the judge.

The start of the track has not changed greatly other than the complete omission of any obedience commands in your approach to the scent pad. After reporting in to the judge be prepared for tracking with the lead played out so the judge may observe the lead, you may stop three meters (approximately nine feet ) before the scent pad to re-position your lead, such as, under the dog’s leg without any type of obedience command (no sit or down). You may also do this while moving towards the scent pad. The dog then should go to the scent pad with the handler, while under control and be given the track command at the scent pad. The handler’s hands may not go below their knee in setting the dog into the track initially and at the re-starts at the articles. The handler may also not go to the scent pad to survey the lay of the track before the beginning of the track.

The leash may be tight or loose, but the handler must be 33 feet behind the dog and must not change pace unless the actual terrain would dictate it.

The indication of articles should be presented in the same manner as the actual tracking of the dog, such as, a dog that tracks with much enthusiasm and drive should not be slow at the articles to the point where it creates a wholly different picture from the overall track.

The dog should also take a good scent pad, not rushing through it from avoidance or nerves, although there is not a set time that the dog must remain at the scent pad that would result in point deduction.

There is still encouragement of the dog allowed on the track but may not be extreme and the “such” command may only be used at the scent pad and at the re-starts on the articles.

BOETCHER HARNESS

You can clip the leash to the metal ring underneath the dog on the harness
You can clip the leash to the collar and have the leash go through the metal ring on a BOETCHER harness underneath the dog.

The FH1 and the FH2 now have the same start, as in the FH1.

Obedience

The union between dog and handler is important and will be one of the criteria whereby the judge evaluates obedience. The dog does not necessarily have to have constant eye contact with the handler or always looking up but must show attention to the handler throughout the obedience phase.

The left about turn and the military international about turn are both correct, but are performed as a pivot move (traveling back over the same ground) and not a curve back, the same about turn must be utilized throughout the whole routine.

The handler must make sure they do the correct heeling pattern in obedience.

The handler is also responsible for taking the correct number of steps in all buildups and in exercises where the dog is left in place. One example, in the buildup of the exercise, 10 to 15 steps. Point deduction for failure in this part of an exercise could range from ½ to 1 point.

At local trials, the handler may still decide in what direction they wish to do the jump exercises. At national events, all handlers will follow the same direction. The same dumbbells are used by all handlers at all events. The handler may not prepare the dumbbell in any way such as, rubbing it before throwing and may not use it as an incentive for the dog. Upon completion of the retrieve exercise, the dumbbell must be held at the right side calmly and along the leg.

The dumbbell must be thrown at least ten paces (approximately 20 to 30 feet) from the handler. If the handler is unable to make the distance, the judge may help the handler with the throw.

Touching the jump may result in a ½ to two point deduction in both directions.

During any part of an exercise where running is required there must be a noticeable change of pace.

Training vests are allowed in local trials but may not be worn in Regional or National events at any time during competition.

PROTECTION

There is still much discussion and different interpretations among some of the foreign judges about the helper being allowed to move back one step before the search or transport. This is still under discussion although almost all foreign judges allow it, some do not, but all are told to adopt this interpretation, the consensus of the majority was that the helper may be instructed to step back one step.

If the dog returns to the handler as he approaches the “live blind”, a deduction of three to four points may be taken.

A dog that goes into the blind and bites the helper, can only receive a “fuss” command to regain control. If the handler gives an “out” command, the team is disqualified.

Call out of the blind is “ Hier, Fuss “.

Heavy gripping of the sleeve after the “out“ may result in up to a 9 point deduction.

If a dog holds onto the sleeve before the “out“, this is not considered faulty.

There is only a small deduction for a shallow grip that changes to a full grip at the dog’s first opportunity in an exercise.

The handler must wait for the judge’s signal to release their dog on the “courage test” and the handler must remain at the point of release until the judge’s signal to come forward to pick up their dog.

The new title of STP (Stobenprufun ) Article Search is covered in the new printing of the rulebook.

Many of the rules or interpretations described above are not new, just more clearly defined than in the past.

2008 North American and FH Championships

May 6, 2008

The folks at the Merrimack Valley Working Dog Club in Concord, NH, did an excellent job of running the show during some less than perfect conditions. We will post a few photos in the days to come.

The results …

FH Champions — Carlos Rojas and Ikke v. ‘t Heukske (90 pts)
SchH1 Champions — Patti Garcia Frei von Hufeisenberg (250 pts)
SchH3 Champions — Mark Saccoccio Joker du Loups du Soleil (289 pts)

For complete results, click HERE.

Sieger Show

May 6, 2008

The San Jose Schutzhund Club did a marvelous job of mounting the 2008 USA Sieger Show. Look for a detailed article in the Schutzhund USA magazine.

For now, here are a shot of the Sieger and Siegerin.

Photo by Roanna Banducci

2008 Siegerin - Vegas vom Mittelwest
Shown with her owner, Julie Martinez and her two children - Tessa & Dylan. On Julie's left are Ed Calderon and Vegas' handler, Gina Kastrup.

Photo by Roanna Banducci

2008 Sieger - Teejay von Wilhendorf
John Hinkel is on the top with Teejay. Klaus Gothe, the working class judge is to the left. On the right is Teejay's handler, Carsten Hoenig.

If you wish to order photos from the show, contact the show photographer, Roanna Banducci. Click HERE to visit her website.

HOT Helpers Selected!

April 4, 2008

Nathanial Roque, Chair of the USA Helper Committee, announced the results of the helper selection for the 2008 HOT/Obedience and Youth Championships.

Lionel Madden
John Bochenek
Josh Zapparolli

The 2008 HOT Championships are being hosted by the OG Buckeye Club at the historic Akron Rubber Bowl -- the third largest university football stadium in Ohio. The event will be held starting June 19 and runs through Sunday, June 22. For more information about the 2008 HOT/Obedience and Youth Championships, see the event website at www.2008HOTUSA.com.

Judge's Inquiry Not Sustained, RE: Carla Griffith

March 17, 2008

On December 7, 2007, USA Member Chris Bettin filed a complaint regarding the conduct of USA Judge Carla Griffith at a USA trial held on November 18 and 19, 2006. He alleged the judge was not present at the AD. Additionally, he claimed a Schutzhund 1 dog should not have been passed because the handler gave the dog a 'Platz' command in order to regain control of the dog at the transistion from the bark and hold to the helper escape. Bettin also claimed the out on the courage test was faulty. Mr. Bettin had no direct knowledge of the AD incident. He was an observer at the SchH1 test.

Director of Judges, Mark Przybylski and committee member, Mark Gardner contacted the witnesses and participants of the November 2006 trial.

Regarding the AD, there was no evidence to support this allegation.
Regarding the SchH1, the Judge's and Helper's responses were in accordance with each other. This was a local club trial and the judge exercised her discretion in evaluating the dog. According to the report,

"This was a local club trial, and some latitude was given to the Schutzhund I dog. This is in line with tradition in our sport, and at the discretion of The Judge, but no blatant rule violation occurred."

The Judge's Committee found the complaint to be, "Not Sustained" and that USA Judge Carla Griffith is allowed to continue her duties in accordance with rules and standards set by USA and its executive board.

Click here to view the Judge's Committee Report …

WUSV Helpers Selected!

March 4, 2008

Photo by Mark Scarberry

Back Row: Chris Carr, Shane Garrehy, Clark Niemitalo, Lotus Perkins, Jim Laubmeier, Jose Lopez
Front Row: Dan Cox & Chuck, Rick Napolitano & Zino, Pat Kennedy & Engie, Mike Diehl & Eick, Nate Harves & Stuka, Jeff Lund & Xato, Tom Huelsman & Hascan

Six USA Helpers — Chris Carr, Jose Lopez, Clark Niemitalo, Lotus Perkins, Shane Garrehy and Jim Laubmeier traveled to Cincinnati for the 2008 WUSV Helper Tryouts on Monday, March 3.

Representatives from the USA WUSV Committee as well as the WUSV were present for the tryouts. Günther Diegel from the WUSV conducted the tryout and selected the following four helpers for the 2008 WUSV World Championships:

Shane Garrehy
Jim Laubmieier
Clark Niemitalo
Lotus Perkins

Thanks to all six for accepting the invitation to attend tryouts and represent USA and congratulations to the final four selected for the WUSV World Championship!

Thanks also to the handlers from the Mideastern region who provided strong dogs to test the mettle of the helpers at this tryout at the Greater Cincinnati Schutzhund Club field.

Rick Napolitano with Zino vom Meiko SchH3, IPO3, HOT
Nate Harves with SG Stuka vom Enckhausen SchH3, IPO3, FH, Kkl1, HOT
Jeff Lund with To-Fast Enzo BHP3, SchH3, IPO3, Kkl2 and Xato von Germanenquelle SchH3, IPO3, Kkl1
Pat Kennedy with SG Engie van den Rohdenhoek SchH3, IPO3, BHP1, Kkl2
Mike Diehl with V Eick von der Berger Hochburg SchH3, FH, Kkl1
Dan Cox with Chuck vom Dorneburger Bach SchH1
Mel Greba with Abel vom Reichtal SchH2
Tom Huelsman with SG Hascan vom Adelmannsfelder Land SchH3, IPO3, BSP, Kkl2

Sieger Show Late Entry Deadline is Monday, March 17!!

Click here to visit the event website.

March 14, 2008

Sieger Show Participants
Ad Special

Share your success with the membership of USA!

Full page in black and white $180 (save $45!)
Full page/Full color $320 (save $80!)
Art design fee: $40 (save yet another $10 per page)

Contact and email ads to:
Cheryl Morris, Schutzhund USA Art Director, for more details.
cherylmorris@ktis.net
(In the subject line of the email, please put "Your Name - Sieger Show Promo")

The first entry deadline, March 3, for the 2008 USA Sieger show has passed. However, you still have time to enter. The deadline for Late Entry is March 17. Additional late entry fees will apply.

We just wanted to share some important information with you regarding the show.

The first entry deadline has passed.. However, you can still use the on-line entry form to get your entry submitted. Click here!
Not submitting your entry form on-line, but still want to pay by credit card? No problem! You can pay on-line with your Visa or Mastercard. Click here!
Sieger Show merchandise is now available for order on-line. Order your shirts, sweatshirts, hats and hoddies now. Check out the order site to see what is available this year. Some merchandise is only available for order on the web site and you will not be able to purchase it at the show. Click here!
Host Hotel Update!!! Rooms for Wednesday and Thursday night are filling up quickly so if you still need to reserve them for those dates, please do so soon! There are still rooms available for Friday and Saturday.
You can still sponsor a trophy on-line! Go to the trophy sponsorship page. Here you can see all of the trophies available and those that have already been sponsored! The names of all trophy sponsors will appear on this website as well as be listed in the show catalog. All donations are greatly appreciated!!! Click here!

2009 Sieger Show Bids

February 26, 2008

The National Breed Warden, Tim Burke, is now accepting bids for the 2009 USA Sieger Show. If you are interested in submitting a bid, please contact Tim.

SV Breed Surveys and Elbows

February 15, 2008

USA Breed Warden, Tim Burke announced that the SV has mandated that all dogs born after January 1, 2004 (regardless of country of origin) must have elbows certified by the SV if they want an SV breed survey. They will not accept OFA elbows.

Tim is meeting with the SV office the first week of March to establish procedures so the USA office can assist members in obtaining SV elbow certification similar to the USA “a” stamp program.

We do not have this requirement yet for USA breed surveys. The Breed Advisory Committee will take this under advisement after the Sieger show to discuss if we want to implement this rule for USA breed surveys.

WUSV 2008: Championship Update

December 14, 2008

The countdown is on!

By the time you read this, there will be less than nine months before the top dog/handler teams from around the world converge on the United States for the 21st WUSV World Championship. Hosted by the United Schutzhund Clubs of America, this world-class event will take place Oct. 9-12, 2008, in the Greater Cincinnati, OH, area.

First, let’s recap the great amount of progress that’s been made so far. USA has selected a 4,000-seat minor league ballpark in Florence, KY, as the site for the trial. The dirt portion of the infield will be replaced with grass. Tracking grounds, about a 10-minute drive from the stadium, will consist of 1,200 acres of grass on rolling hills.

Our major sponsor, Royal Canin, has been secured, as has our equipment sponsor, Hallmark K9. The project plan for the event has been further detailed, and a budget has been finalized and approved by the Executive Board.

On the promotions front, we have an official event logo, and the event web site (www.wusv2008.org) is live. The web site is an excellent resource for spectators and competitors alike, and will include extensive details on everything from route planning and travel information to officials, sponsors, key contacts, results and team bios. If you’d like a sneak peak into the event location and facilities, check out the short video located on the home page. Be sure to visit the WUSV 2008 Event Merchandise shop (www.wusv2008.org/shop.htm ) to order commemorative t-shirts, sweatshirts and hats decorated with the official event logo—available now.

We are also thrilled to report that we have exceeded our membership fundraising goal! We hoped to raise $25,000 from 450 donations (which represents about 11% of the membership) by April 2007. To-date we have raised $33,780 from about 630 individuals. Thanks to those members for their generous and much-needed support, and let’s keep those donations coming.

Though we have made great strides, there is still much hard work to be done to ensure that this is truly an event to remember. The success of this championship depends on the support and involvement of our membership—are you up to the challenge?

Karen Groh is compiling an extensive database of volunteers. She can be reached at (805) 529-1005, or by email at k9@Grohaus.com. Please contact her if you'd like to be part of the team.

Jennifer Acevedo
PR Coordinator, WUSV Committee
press@wusv2008.org

North American & FH Website Posted!

February 4, 2008

The North American and FH Championships website is now on-line!

2008 North American and FH Championships

Here a few key items:

Show Site: Concord, NH
Date: April 30 - May 4, 2008
Host Hotel: Holiday Inn, Concord, NH.

2008 WUSV/FCI Team Forms Posted

January 17, 2008

The rules and candidate information forms for the 2008 WUSV/FCI USA team are posted in the USA forms section of the website.

Click here to go to the USA forms page.

2007 General Board Meeting Minutes

December 25, 2007

USA Secretary, Sara Wallick has posted the minutes of the 2007 General Board meeting. To view the minutes,

Click here to view the minutes.

Sieger Show Judges

Monday, October 29, 2007

The Breed Advisory Committee has chosen SV judges Herr Wilfried Scheld to judge the female working class and Herr Klaus Gothe to judge the male working class.

Additional classes and USA judge assignments will be announced soon.

Sieger Show Date Changed!

Sunday, October 28, 2007

The date for the 2008 Sieger Show has been changed from April 18 — 20 to April 11 — 13.

Last Thursday, National Breed Warden Tim Burke received an email from the SV office in Germany, informing him that the SV has scheduled their spring meeting for the same weekend as our 2008 Sieger show. Therefore, the judges would not be able to attend our show because they were required to attend the SV meeting.

After a flurry of phone calls and emails, Tim was able to secure the original SV judges, the venue, and the Host hotel for the weekend prior, April 11-13. Please ensure that you change your plans accordingly.

National Breed Warden Tim Burker stated, "We apologize for the inconvenience, but due to the scheduling of the SV meeting, we had no choice. The host hotel has moved all existing reservations to the new date. While somewhat inconvenient (to change dates) we are early enough to avoid major issues or conflicts."

The host hotel states that it is actually a better date for those making reservations that want double bed rooms because of more availability.

If you have already made your reservations, please check with the host hotel to ensure they have been changed correctly. If you are planning on staying someplace else, check with that hotel. As always, get a confirmation number and keep your paperwork for the reservation.

Burke noted, "I spoke at length with Terry Macias (of the sponsoring San Jose club) today and he has the whole region helping out with the show. They are very excited and in Terry’s words 'we really are looking forward to putting on a great event for our USA members.' Please support Terry and the region for this event and encourage the USA members in your respective areas to participate."

Trial Secretary Tutorial

Tuesday, Oct 23, 2007

Your club has a trial coming and they need a trial secretary. What are you gonna do?

Gail Kendall from the Phoenix Schutzhund Club has distilled her long experience into a 30 minute tutorial on how to handle that task. From setting up the entry forms, the judge's sheet and the final listing of the scores and titles, this outstanding presentation covers it all!

Getting the paperwork completed correctly is a huge task in the USA office. Chasing down corrections on the forms is a major effort. If all the forms came in correct and complete, it would free a significant amount of resources to better serve the USA membership.

The tutorial is about 30 minutes long. You will need to have the Flash plug-in available on your computer to play it. Most browsers already have this installed.

Click here to view the tutorial.

2007 WUSV Team Places 10^th

Photo courtesy of Martin Barrow
Sunday, October 7, 2007

(from Left to Right) USA Team Captain - Josef Mravik, Ronny Brummer - Issa V. Haus Safko, Deleta Jones - Ello von Herretts Fire, Mike Diehl - Basco ze Slovanskeho Domu, WDA Team Captain - Russell Osburn, James Honda - Bordermere Aran, Karoly Meszaros - Aceofnike van het Bleekhof, Todd Shilkret - Odin vom Argatos, William McClure - Orchard Knob's Ariel

USA Vice President Randall Hoadley has reported the USA team for the 2007 WUSV has placed tenth. More to follow …

Universal Sieger Nominees Announced

Friday, Oct 12, 2007

Tim Burke, USA National Breed Warden, has announced the following candidates for Universal Sieger …

Alex vom Eisenhaus
Owner: Pedro Jimenez Jr. - Sterling, Virgina
Arco von der Wilmothhaus
Owner: Kathy Wilmoth - Tallmadge, Ohio
Cooper vom Mittelwest
Owner: Jerrold Gray - St. Paul, Minnesota
Gildewangen’s Jaz Victor
Owner: Carl Morgan - Hampstead, Maryland
Ushigardens Matty
Owner: Lena Melendez - Centereach, New York

Do you know the way to San Jose?

Friday, Sept 28, 2007

The BAC has voted to approve the bid from the San Jose Schutzhund Club for the 2008 Sieger show. The show will be held on April 18 through 20, 2008. Watch the USA website for the trial website and other announcements.

Is Your Event Using a Correctly Classified Helper?

This is a reminder from the USA Helper Committee regarding the proper use of Helpers in all authorized USA Events. There has been some confusion regarding the level of helpers to work events.

The guidelines are:

All helpers working a USA Event must be current USA members and have a Helper Book with a classification noted in the book of Basic or higher.
Entry level helpers may not work events. These are helpers that are USA Members and have purchased a book, but not attended and passed a seminar/classification.
Basic level helpers may only work club level events — not regional championships or nationals.
Club level helpers may work club level events and be considered for selection at regional level events.
Regional level Helpers may work club and regional events and be considered for national events.
National level helpers may work any event.
Teaching helpers may teach as well as work any level of event that they are selected to work.

The current helper classifications are listed on the USA website. Click here to view the helper classification list. However, the most recent classification noted in the helper's book will be the determining one when selecting a helper for trial work.

In the event that a club does not have a "classified" helper available to work an event they should contact the Helper Program Director to request a special circumstances waiver to allow the event to proceed.

It is the Trial Secretary and, secondly, it is the judge's job to verify that the helper is properly "Classified" to work the event. It is also the helper's responsibility to know what level event they are allowed to work.

Failure to follow the program rules may lead to unsportsmanlike conduct charges, revocation of the Helper's book or charges against the club.

The goal and mission of the helper program is to improve the quality , education and performance of trial helper work at all levels of events. Our committee is here to help and we will support helpers and clubs in any way to promote the proper progress of the scheduled event.

Thanks for your continued support of the Helper Program

Nathaniel Roque
Chair of National Helper Committee

GEC Committee Changes

Thursday, August 23, 2007

Christine Gajda has stepped down. Christine was very helpful to all of us in the formative stages of the GEC. She has taken on a new position which does not lend itself - in terms of any free time - to be an active member of the GEC. All of us at the GEC and USA will miss her contributions to the various issues. We wish her the best in her new endeavors

Melinda Darby has joined the committee as the new committee secretary.

Marnie Rose has joined the GEC. She hails from Ohio and is very passionate about countering anti-dog and breed-specific legislation.

If you wish to add your efforts in support of the General Education Committee, contact Rifky MacKeen. His contact information is listed on the USA Committee page.

2008 General Board Meeting Results

November 7, 2008

This is just a preliminary summary. A full report will follow.

The 2008 USA General Board Meeting was held on November 6, 2008 in Hutto, Texas. Sixty-four club delegates attended. USA President Lyle Roetemeyer honored USA's WUSV team. The President's Award for Outstanding Service was presented to Craig Groh and Johannes Grewe. The organization's financial status is improving. The WUSV was a profitable event.

USA Secretary Sara Wallick reported a net gain of 6 new clubs since the last GBM — we lost three clubs and nine new clubs were formed.

Election Reports

President — Lyle Roetemeyer
Vice President — Craig Groh
Secretary— Sara Wallick
Treasurer— Sean O'Kane
Executive Board Members At Large— Nathaniel Roque, Terry Macias, Johannes Grewe, Frank Phillips, Al Govednik
Director of Judges — Mark Przybylski
National Breed Warden — Tim Burke
Auditing Committee— Gordon Esselmann, Kay Koerner, Kris Taves
Judges Committee/USA Judge— Carla Griffith
World Championship Committee — Thomas Vollrath, Debra Zappia, Lisa Jacquin, Gary Hanrahan
Board of Inquiry — Scott Boedecker, Jeff Govednik, Jim Alloway, Laurie Coppola, John Bonechek. Alternates — Pam Hanrahan Chris Bettin

Candidate Slate for 2008 General Board Meeting

September 18, 2008

All names are shown in alphabetical order and not in order of any preference.

The Nominations Committee has afforded all potential candidates, irrespective of whether they are included in this list or not, the opportunity of declaring their intentions and publishing their resumes and achievements in the Magazine, website (www.GermanShepherdDog.com) and the Blog (www.usa-blog.org.

President

The candidate statements are available on-line at:
Candidate Statements …

There were two presidential aspirants this year. We have interviewed them, reviewed their resumes and their proposed goals and plans for the USA. This, notwithstanding, we were unable to choose one candidate over the other as both scored equally when we applied our evaluation criteria. As such we are nominating both names so that the membership can make an appropriate choice.

(In alphabetical order and not in any order of preference)

Randall Hoadley
Lyle Roetemeyer

Other Offices …

Vice President — Craig Groh
Treasurer — Bill Plumb
Secretary — Sara Wallick
Director of Judges — Mark Przybylski
National Breed Warden — Tim Burke
Directors at Large

Al Govednik
Terry Macias
Frank Phillips
Howie Rodriguez
Nathaniel Roque

Auditing Committee

Gordon Esselmann
Kay Koerner
Kris Taves

Board of Inquiry

Jim Alloway
Chris Bettin
Terry Fisk
Heather Gray
Gail Kendall
Thomas Payne
Thomas Shaftoe

Judges Committee — Floyd Wilson
World Championship Committee

Gary Hanrahan
Lisa Jacquin
Howie Rodriguez
Thomas Vollrath

Submitted
Rifky Mackeen
Chair — Nominating Committee

2008 General Board Meeting

August 11, 2008

Download the PDF documents here

The USA General Board meeting will be held on November 6^th this year in Austin, Texas. If your club plans to send a delegate to the meeting, a delegate form must be submitted to me no later than 30 days prior to the meeting. A copy of the delegate form in PDF format is enclosed and is also available on the USA website. It can be completed online and then printed. Please be sure to send the delegate form to the USA Secretary, not to the USA Office or the USA Treasurer.

Two club officers must sign for the delegate/alternate(s) selected, and the delegate/alternate(s) may not sign for themselves. In addition to prior submittal of the delegate form, please have the delegate/ alternate(s) carry a copy to the meeting. Clubs that are granted affiliated or full-member status after October 6, 2008 may send the delegate form to the meeting with the delegate/alternate(s). Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the voting process at the General Board meeting.

Each full-member club may seat one voting delegate and each affiliated club may seat one non-voting delegate at the General Board meeting. A club may replace its delegate and/or alternate(s) as necessary. Please notify me immediately of any replacements.

In order to be eligible to seat a delegate at the General Board meeting, the USA dues of the club must be current, the USA dues of all members of the club must be current, and the club may not be under any disciplinary action from USA. The club must maintain a minimum of five members (only two of whom may be part of a family membership) and must hold at least one sanctioned USA trial per year. Also, a complete and current club membership list must be submitted to the USA Office for verification along with the USA dues of the club, whether or not the club is planning to send a delegate to the General Board meeting. It will not be possible to seat delegates if these requirements are not met.

If you wish to have confirmation of receipt of your delegate form, you may request email confirmation or use USPS certified mail/return receipt requested.

It will be very important for delegates to be seated and ready for roll call promptly at the meeting start time. The delegate cards will be handed out as roll is called.

Please send a delegate to the meeting if at all possible, as there will be important decisions made regarding our organization. In addition, this year there will be elections for President, Vice President, Secretary, Treasurer, Director of Judges, National Breed Warden, Directors at Large (5), Auditing Committee (3), Board of Inquiry (7), Judges Committee/USA Judge, and World Championship Committee (4).

Sara Wallick
USA Secretary

2007 General Board Meeting

November 8, 2007

The USA General Board Meeting was held on Thursday. Some highlights …

Proposed amendment that would eliminate Directors-at-large was not approved.
Felony Prohibition for Teaching Helpers Approved
Approval of Artificial Insemination for USA Registry
2008 National Events
- North American-- Merrimack (New England)
- HOT -- OG Buckeye (Mid-East)
- Nationals -- Lone Star/Austin (South Central)
The HOT & NA events will be combined in 2009.
Proposed bylaw amendments prohibiting convicted felons from holding office as members of the EB, officers, regional officers and judges passed. Waiver (proposal 5) passed.
Laurie Tollifson was recognized for her outstanding work on developing USA's registry. Laurie contributed innumerable hours on this project, gratis, for USA.
A quorum of 35 club delegates was seated.
Click here to view the meeting agenda.

General Board Meeting

Monday, August 20, 2007

Click here for the Delegate Form
Click here for the General Board Meeting announcement

The USA General Board meeting will be held on November 8^th this year in Carrollton, Georgia. If your club plans to send a delegate to the meeting, a delegate form must be submitted to Sara Wallick, the USA Secretary, no later than 30 days prior to the meeting. A copy is also available on the USA website in PDF format which can be completed online and then printed. (Click here for the Delegate Form) Please be sure to send the delegate form to the USA Secretary, not to the USA Office or the USA Treasurer.

Two club officers must sign for the delegate/alternate(s) selected, and the delegate/alternate(s) may not sign for themselves. In addition to prior submittal of the delegate form, please have the delegate/ alternate(s) carry a copy to the meeting. Clubs that are granted affiliated or full-member status after October 9, 2007 may send the delegate form to the meeting with the delegate/alternate(s). Please feel free to contact Sara if you have any questions regarding the voting process at the General Board meeting. Sara's contact information is listed on the Delegate Letter form.

Each full-member club may seat one voting delegate at the General Board meeting and each affiliated club may seat one non-voting delegate. A club may replace its delegate and/or alternate(s) as necessary. Please notify me immediately of any replacements.

Important

You must send the delegate forms directly to Sara — not the USA office or the USA Treasurer. The forms must be submitted to the USA Secretary no later than 30 days prior to the November 8^th meeting.

Her address is on the delegate form.

In order to be eligible to seat a delegate at the General Board meeting

the USA dues of the club must be current,
the USA dues of all members of the club must be current,
the club may not be under any disciplinary action from USA,
the club must maintain a minimum of five members (only two of whom may be part of a family membership)
the club must hold at least one sanctioned USA trial per year.
a complete and current club membership list must be submitted to the USA Office for verification along with the USA dues of the club, whether or not the club is planning to send a delegate to the General Board meeting.

It will not be possible to seat delegates if these requirements are not met.

If you wish to have confirmation of receipt of your delegate form, you may request email confirmation or use USPS certified mail/return receipt requested.

It will be very important for delegates to be seated and ready for roll call promptly at the meeting start time. The delegate cards will be handed out as roll is called.

Please send a delegate to the meeting if at all possible, as there will be important decisions made regarding our organization.

In addition, this year there will be elections for:

Judges Committee members at large (2 positions)
National Events Committee (4 positions)
Nominating Committee (5 positions)
Director at Large (1 position)

Sara Wallick
USA Secretary

Office Announcements

Registration Forms

Thursday, August 23, 2007

It's very important to use the correct registration form. The USA registration form is different than the dual USA/SV registration form. They also have somewhat differing documentation requirements.

We have too many members filling out the wrong forms for the registrations we offer. This results many phone calls the USA office staff has to make to correct the problems. This delays the processing of all registrations and other work.

See the Forms Page for the correct form. Remember, use the USA-ONLY form for registrations under the new USA breed registration program. Use the USA/SV forms for dual USA/SV registration.

Youth Sport Books

Sunday, August 19, 2007

The Youth Sport Books are now available from the USA office. They are $5 each. Visit the Youth Program page to learn more about the USA Youth Program and the Youth Sport scoring system. Order your score book at Youth Sport Book Order Form

Registration Update

Friday, August 17, 2007

In June, USA VP Randall Hoadley and USA National Breed Warden Tim Burke traveled to the Schutzhund USA office to meet with staff and assist in resolving some of the issues that the membership has brought up as well as review the new registration system.

Current SV breed surveys

The SV would not process breed surveys that were written in English. The office has attempted numerous times to have the SV modify the contract to allow the SV to translate the documents, but the SV has not yet agreed to do so.

Schutzhund USA has hired a translator and forwarded all of the pending registrations to the translator. The translator has given us a date of August 15th to have the backlog of surveys completed. USA President Lyle Roetemeyer and USA National Breed Warden Tim Burke will be meeting with the SV office at the German Sieger show to find a permanent solution for translations. Until that resolution, the translator hired by Schutzhund USA will complete the breed surveys.

Current Schutzhund USA registrations

All the pending registrations have been processed and the USA office will begin printing and mailing them in the next two weeks.

New Schutzhund USA registration system

Tim met with Becky Burns and Pam Niccum to review the new Schutzhund USA registration system. The new registration database was built through the volunteer efforts of USA member Laurie Tollifson, who donated countless hours of time to this effort. As you are aware, there have been many problems that delayed the registration project.

One of the biggest issues that came up was that the database application was finished last December, but there was no data entered.
The registration document has a multi-generational pedigree on the inside, similar to the SV registration document. It would have been necessary for the office staff to type each line in on the pedigree and that would have been very inefficient.
One of the primary goals of the registration database is to develop a database of USA dogs that includes information on USA titles and event results. We sourced the database information and Laurie integrated that information into the registration application. The office has been using and entering information into the database during the last two months.
The team at the office test printed a sample registration document for Tim. The group decided that a higher quality paper with pre-printed borders and blocked areas should be required because the membership deserves a quality document that properly reflects their dogs’ pedigree. Kathy Mocanin was able to source the paper and worked with the office on standardizing the process.
The new paper will be delivered to the office next week and the office will begin issuing new Schutzhund USA pedigrees in the next two weeks.

Previous Year's Executive Ballots

Executive Board Ballots

(Click on the link above to view the completed ballots.)

Note

Executive Ballots that involve Board of Inquiry cases are not published until the balloting process has been completed.

BOI Case: Eric Eisenberg v. Gary Hanrahan
E-Ballot #32-08

Statement by Lyle Roetemeyer, USA President

This particular case took up an extraordinary amount of the Board of Inquiry’s and Executive Board's time in an effort to make sure that it was handled correctly.

Compounding the issues surrounding this case was a criminal court case in the State of Alabama involving both of the key individuals in the BOI case. Mr. Hanrahan was found "Not Guilty" of all charges brought against him in the criminal case.

The Executive Board called upon the expertise of USA's legal counsel, and several conference calls were held to discuss the facts involved in the case. The decision to accept the determination of the Board of Inquiry was based upon the legal advice of counsel with respect to all of the facts presented to us in this case, including the court transcript from the criminal case in Alabama against Mr. Hanrahan.

Motion by Al Govednik, seconded by Sara Wallick, to accept the determination and recommendation of the Board of Inquiry in the case of Eric Eisenberg v. Gary Hanrahan and to adopt the following resolution:

Whereas, The Executive Board, having carefully considered all of the issues involved in the complaint filed by Eric Eisenberg against Gary Hanrahan;

Whereas, Having referred to the Board of Inquiry the reconsideration of their prior recommendation in light of the new evidence from the trial transcript in the matter of the State of Alabama v. Gary Hanrahan;

Whereas, The Board of Inquiry having carefully considered the transcript and having decided that such evidence did not change their determination that Hanrahan engaged in conduct that was disruptive of a USA-sanctioned trial;

Whereas, The Executive Board takes notice of the findings of the Board of Inquiry that Gary Hanrahan engaged in unsportsmanlike behavior when his actions on December 15, 2007 disrupted a USA-sanctioned trial and such conduct was contrary to the best interests of USA;

Resolved,

That based upon all of above, the Executive Board accepts the Board of Inquiry’s recommendation and hereby publicly censures Gary Hanrahan for unsportsmanlike conduct for his actions on December 15, 2007. While Hanrahan may have believed that he was properly in defense of another’s property, taking actions that disrupted a USA-sanctioned trial was not in the best interests of USA. By publicly censuring Hanrahan, USA, the Executive Board, and the Board of Inquiry, individually and collectively, make no factual finding as to Eric Eisenberg’s or CASC’s right to utilize the field in question, nor do any of the above make any factual finding that Gary Hanrahan was or was not acting at the direction of the owner of the property or believed he was doing so.

USA’s only factual finding here is that Hanrahan’s conduct with regard to driving over the tracks at a USA-sanctioned trial was not in the best interests of USA. Hanrahan is publicly admonished that his behavior on December 15, 2007 fell below that reasonably expected of USA members and he is directed to make certain that all of his conduct at USA-sanctioned events in the future is proper and is in accord with sportsmanlike behavior and conduct expected of all USA members.

Further, the Executive Board finds that much if not all the conduct of Eric Eisenberg and Gary Hanrahan on December 15, 2007 was in furtherance of their continuing interpersonal conflict. Neither party to this dispute has distinguished themselves as exhibiting the behavior, cooperation, and good will expected of all USA members. The Executive Board advises both Gary Hanrahan and Eric Eisenberg that any future conduct, communication, actions, or disputes by either party in furtherance of their continuing interpersonal conflict that impacts any USA event at any time in the future will lead to more severe disciplinary action against one or both parties, including expulsion from USA. While any future disciplinary action will be based upon the particular facts and circumstances of each case, it is the sense of the current Executive Board that any suspension for either or both parties will be for a minimum of six (6) months. All are advised to conduct themselves accordingly.

Yes– - (18) (Lyle Roetemeyer, Craig Groh, Sara Wallick, Sean O’Kane, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Johannes Grewe, Terry Macias, Frank Phillips, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer), No–1 (Pedro Jimenez), )
No - (1) (Pedro Jimenez)
No Response - (Steve Cobb, Willie Pope)

Motion Carried 12/14/2008.

2009 USA-GSD National Championship Host
E-Ballot #31-08

Selection of host club for 2009 USA-GSD National Championship from two bids submitted to the National Events Committee:

Alpha K9 Schutzhund Club (New Egypt, NJ)
Machtig Strom Schutzhund Verein (Moline, IL)

Machtig Strom– - (13) (Lyle Roetemeyer, Craig Groh, Sara Wallick, Sean O’Kane, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Nathaniel Roque, Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry)
Alpha K9 - (7) (Johannes Grewe, Terry Macias, Frank Phillips, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Pedro Jimenez, David Witmer)
No Response - (Willie Pope)

Machtig Strom Schutzhund Verein selected 12/3/08.

BOI Case: Der Michigan Schutzhund Verein v. Timothy Wild
E-Ballot #28-08

Motion by Sara Wallick, seconded by Al Govednik, to accept the determination and recommendation of the Board of Inquiry in the case of Der Michigan Schutzhund Verein v. Timothy Wild.

Charge

Timothy Wild was charged with conduct prejudicial to the interests of USA as a result of kicking another competitor's dog in the head during the course of the trial, in plain view of trial observers. The charge was sustained.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

The BOI has conducted a thorough investigation and received testimony from numerous spectators, event personnel, a regional officer, trial participants, and SV and USA judges. It was made clear that this matter involved solely Mr. Wild's actions. There is no dispute that, during the trial at Der Michigan, Mr. Wild kicked another competitor’s dog (belonging to Chris Wild, the defendant's wife) in the head while the competitor was exiting the trial field.

The investigation revealed that Mr. Wild's behavior was addressed by the training director and the club secretary of Der Michigan. Mr. Wild was advised that his behavior was unacceptable, and was told that Der Michigan would not prefer charges, but would hold this incident in abeyance, with the understanding that there should be no reoccurrence of uncontrolled outrage. Thereafter, Mr. Wild was disqualified at a USA-sanctioned event at Capitol Area Schutzhund Club for uncontrolled anger. This incident precipitated the filing by Der Michigan of charges of unsportsmanlike conduct against Mr. Wild for the trial at Der Michigan held on July 29, 2007.

In conclusion, this board recognizes that Timothy Wild did engage in conduct that constituted unsportsmanlike conduct, which is highly prejudicial to the interests of USA. The USA Bylaws specifically state that one of the objectives of the organization is “...to promote humane training methods for the working dog...” Based upon the foregoing, the BOI recommends the following:

That Timothy Wild be censured for unsportsmanlike conduct.
That Timothy Wild be advised that, should any further charges with respect to instances of unsportsmanlike conduct be heard, he will be subject to more severe discipline, including possible expulsion from USA.

Yes - (20) (Lyle Roetemeyer, Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Terry Macias, Frank Phillips, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Pedro Jimenez, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer),
No - (0)
No Response - (1) (Willie Pope)
Motion carried 9/10/2008

GSD National Championship Waiver for Manuel Valdes
E-Ballot #26-08

Motion by Tim Burke, seconded by Mark Przybylski, to grant a waiver to allow Manuel Valdes to enter the 2008 GSD National Championship with a qualifying score obtained on his imported SchH3 dog on August 2 rather than by August 1 as required. Manuel imported his dog in 2007; but, due to several job transfers, had forgotten to register it with USA and have the scorebook certified until July 17, 2008. He was not aware of the following rule on imported SchH3 dogs:

2001 GBM–Taunton (National Championship Qualification Process)

Motion to modify the existing National Championship qualification rule to read: Any SchH3 dog imported into the U.S. whose scorebook is registered with the USA Administrator of Records Office after January 1 of any calendar year must attain a qualifying score by August 1 of the same calendar year for entrance into that year’s Nationals. This rule does not pertain to imported SchH1 or SchH2 dogs or their equivalent.

Yes - (18) (Lyle Roetemeyer, Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Pedro Jimenez, Michelle Kutelis, David Witmer),
No - (1) (Mark Scarberry)
No Response - (2) (Pia Blackwell, Willie Pope)
Motion carried 9/10/2008

2008 GSD National Championship Slate of Helpers
E-Ballot #25-08

Motion by Nathaniel Roque, seconded by Mark Przybylski, to approve the USA Helper Committee’s recommended slate of helpers for the 2008 GSD National Championship:

John Bochenek
Jim Laubmeier
Lionel Madden
Charles Ottesen

Final placement (front, back, and alternate) will be selected per the USA Helper Program by a helper tryout on Wednesday preceding the event.

Yes - (20) No Response - (1)
Motion carried - 8/13/08

Appeal of Mid-Eastern Regional Director Decision
E-Ballot #24-08

Falconhurst Police Canine Corps has appealed the decision of Mid-Eastern Regional Director Mark Scarberry to cancel the event authorization for a Helper Seminar/Evaluation that Falconhurst hosted July 12–13, 2008 with USA Teaching Helper A. J. Slaughter. The event authorization was canceled due to the failure of the club to provide written event notification to the other clubs in the region at least three weeks in advance of the event, as notification was provided just one day prior to the event instead. The event authorization was issued on June 5, 2008, and the event has been posted on both the USA and Mid-Eastern Region websites since that time. Unfortunately, however, the trial secretary overlooked the three-week event notification rule. Unfortunately, however, the trial secretary overlooked the three-week event notification rule.

Shall the Executive Board overrule the decision of the regional director and waive the event notification requirement for the Helper Seminar/Evaluation held July 12–13, 2008?

Yes - (16) (Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Scott Hedger, Pedro Jimenez, Michelle Kutelis, David Witmer),
No - (2) Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann)
Needs Further Discussion - (1) Lyle Roetemeyer
Abstained - (1) Mark Scarberry
No Response - (1) Willie Pope
Motion carried 7/30/08

Fiscal Year 2009 Budget
E-Ballot #23-08

Motion by Bill Plumb, seconded by Sara Wallick, to approve the fiscal year 2009 budget of total income $528,500, total expenses $558,408, cash reserve contribution $40,000, income tax expense $10,000, and net income $92.

FY 2009 Budget

Yes–(15) Lyle Roetemeyer, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Scott Hedger, Willie Pope, David Witmer
No–(4) Randall Hoadley, Gordon Esselmann, Pedro Jimenez, Mark Scarberry
NFD– (1) Howie Rodriguez
NR– (1) Michelle Kutelis
Motion carried 6/28/08.

2009 USA Working Dog Championships Host
E-ballot #22-08

Selection of host club(s) for 2009 USA Working Dog Championships from two bids submitted by the National Events Committee.

Applicants:

Iowa Hundesport Club
Twin Beech SchH Club/Cumberland Valley SchH and Police Club

Vote:
Iowa Hundesport–5 (Randall Hoadley, Bill Plumb, Al Govednik, Terry Macias, Scott Hedger)
Twin Beech/Cumberland Valley –15 (Sara Wallick, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Frank Phillips, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann, Pedro Jimenez, Michelle Kutelis, Willie Pope, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer)
ABS–1 (Lyle Roetemeyer).
Twin Beech/Cumberland Valley selected (6/27/08).

Appeal of Northeastern Regional Director Decision
E-Ballot #19-08

The Greater Philadelphia Schutzhund Club has appealed the decision of Northeastern Regional Director Pedro Jimenez to cancel the event authorization for a trial that Greater Philadelphia was to host May 31–June 1, 2008 with an SV judge. The event authorization was canceled due to the failure of the club to provide written event notification to the other clubs in the region at least three weeks in advance of the event, as notification was provided just 17 days prior to the event instead. The event authorization was issued for this trial in June 2007, and the trial has been posted on both the USA and Northeastern Region websites since that time. Unfortunately, however, the trial secretary overlooked the three-week event notification rule.

Shall the Executive Board overrule the decision of the regional director and allow the trial scheduled for May 31–June 1, 2008 to proceed?

Vote: Yes–18 (Lyle Roetemeyer, Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Arthur Collins, Jim Elder, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer),
No–1 (Steve Cobb), ABS–1 (Pedro Jimenez),
NR–1 (Gordon Esselmann)
Motion carried 5/30/08.

AWDF Titles
E-Ballot #14-08

Motion by Nathaniel Roque, seconded by Al Govednik, that Mark Przybylski be permitted to accept a working dog judge license in the AWMA (American Working Malinois Association).

Background

The AWMA is an AWDF member club. Currently their DOJ is also a USA Judge and the only other AWMA Judge is also a USA Judge (myself). The EB has in the past allowed our judges to accept licenses from other AWDF member clubs as a way to support these organizations and to build the credibility of our judges and our program. At all times, our USA Judges are expected to hold their commitment as a USA Judge first

Vote: Yes–20 (Lyle Roetemeyer, Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Jim Elder, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Pedro Jimenez, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer), ABS–1 (Mark Przybylski). Motion carried 5/1/08.

AWDF Titles
E-Ballot #13-08

Motion by Al Govednik, seconded by Nathaniel Roque, that USA offer the new AWDF titles (AWD1, AWD2, and AWD3). These AWDF titles will be recognized exclusively for progression pertaining to those titles. These titles will not be recognized for entry in the USA-GSD National Championship, for the USA SchH3 Club, or for the USA Sports Medals Program. These titles will not be recognized for German Shepherd Dogs as prerequisites for breeding, breed surveys, breed shows, or registration with USA.

Information on these titles is available at:

Vote: Yes–18 (Lyle Roetemeyer, Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer),
No–2 (Jim Elder, Pedro Jimenez),
NFD–1 (Mark Przybylski).
Motion carried 4/18/08.

2008 H.O.T./Obedience/Youth Championships Slate of Helpers
E-Ballot #12-08

Motion by Nathaniel Roque, seconded by Sara Wallick, to approve the USA Helper Committee’s recommended slate of helpers for the 2008 H.O.T./Obedience/Youth Championships:

Josh Zapparolli
Lionel Madden
John Bochenek

Vote
Yes–21 (Lyle Roetemeyer, Randall Hoadley, Sara Wallick, Bill Plumb, Mark Przybylski, Tim Burke, Al Govednik, Frank Phillips, Terry Macias, Howie Rodriguez, Nathaniel Roque, Pia Blackwell, Steve Cobb, Arthur Collins, Jim Elder, Gordon Esselmann, Scott Hedger, Pedro Jimenez, Michelle Kutelis, Mark Scarberry, David Witmer).
Motion carried unanimously 4/18/08

2008 North American Championship Slate of Helpers
E-Ballot #11-08

Motion by Nathaniel Roque, seconded by Sara Wallick, to approve the USA Helper Committee’s recommended slate of helpers for the 2008 North American Championship:

Don Yelle
Steve Romard
Charles Ottesen
Jeff Calder

USA Member News & Info

Executive Ballots, Organization News, USA Office Announcements, USA General Board Meeting Information,

USA Organization News

New USA Scorebooks

2008 Universal Siegerin

WUSV Meeting

2008 WUSV Judge's Meeting

DEVELOPMENT OF A DOG

WHAT MAKES THE “V” PERFORMANCE

IMPLEMNTATION OF TRIAL RULES

DISQUALIFICATION

TRACKING

Reporting In

Article Indication

Praise

Working of the Track

FH1 and FH2

Evaluating the Track

OBEDIENCE

PROTECTION

Blind Search

HOLD AND BARK

OVERALL PROTECTION EVALUATION

RULE CHANGERS

GEC 2008 Awards

Award Forms

USA Team for the 2008 WUSV

WUSV Banquet Tickets

Regional Directors' and President's Awards

USA Rulebook Changes

TRACKING

Obedience

PROTECTION

2008 North American and FH Championships

Sieger Show

HOT Helpers Selected!

Judge's Inquiry Not Sustained, RE: Carla Griffith

WUSV Helpers Selected!

Sieger Show Late Entry Deadline is Monday, March 17!!

Sieger Show ParticipantsAd Special

2009 Sieger Show Bids

SV Breed Surveys and Elbows

WUSV 2008: Championship Update

The countdown is on!

North American & FH Website Posted!

2008 WUSV/FCI Team Forms Posted

2007 General Board Meeting Minutes

Sieger Show Judges

Sieger Show Date Changed!

Trial Secretary Tutorial

2007 WUSV Team Places 10th

Universal Sieger Nominees Announced

Do you know the way to San Jose?

Is Your Event Using a Correctly Classified Helper?

GEC Committee Changes

2008 General Board Meeting Results

Election Reports

Candidate Slate for 2008 General Board Meeting

2008 General Board Meeting

Download the PDF documents here

2007 General Board Meeting

General Board Meeting

Important

Office Announcements

Registration Forms

Youth Sport Books

Registration Update

Current SV breed surveys

Current Schutzhund USA registrations

New Schutzhund USA registration system

Previous Year's Executive Ballots

Executive Board Ballots

(Click on the link above to view the completed ballots.)

Note

Statement by Lyle Roetemeyer, USA President

Charge

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

2001 GBM–Taunton (National Championship Qualification Process)

FY 2009 Budget

Sieger Show Participants
Ad Special

2007 WUSV Team Places 10^th